CLE Course Review

Archive for October, 2009

15 October
0Comments

Are There Any Great, New Mining Stocks Left?


Are There Any Great, New Mining Stocks Left?

Where are the hot and cold spots around the world for resource investors? The stampeding bull market in commodities has investors reaching for new ideas. Highly respected newsletter writer Lawrence Roulston of Resource Opportunities favors Canada, Alaska and China for investing in mining and energy companies.

Stock Interview: Lets get the cold spots out of the way so investors are forewarned about which countries to avoid.

Lawrence Roulston:
A lot of the (mining) companies that went overseas in decades back are recognizing the political difficulties with dealing in some jurisdictions. These include places like Indonesia, Columbia, and several of the African countries, such as Congo, Sudan and Eritrea. All of those places where there are great geological prospects, but are more and more risky to deal in. I think some of that mining is coming back closer to home, which is right here in Canada.

Stock Interview: So Canada is on your favorite countries list?

Lawrence Roulston:
At the very top of the list would be Canada. As of right now, taking into account the geological potential, political situation, infrastructure and all the other issues, I would (highly) rate Canada and British Columbia. They have had decades of work. But for the last decade, there hasnt been very much going on. The companies are just coming back and picking up with whats been going on. Similarly, Ontario, Quebec tremendous geological potential and its been kind of ignored for a long time. Canada is now the most important place in the world for diamonds, representing 50 percent on exploration spending for diamonds.

Stock Interview: Is there a specific mineral or metal that makes Canada especially appealing?

Lawrence Roulston:
Its the whole gambit. Canada has always been one of the top metal producers, and its coming back to life. Of course, gold is at the top of the list, but also base metals and uranium. The Athabasca Basin in northern Saskatchewan is far and away the most important area to be looking at, geologically. Its currently the biggest source of uranium and contains the highest grade deposit. There are other uranium prospective areas in Canada that are just emerging. The Thelon Basin in the Northwest Territories, north of the Athabasca Basin, is very similar, geologically, to the Athabasca Basin. It had some work done in the 1970s, and its been pretty much ignored until very recently. Going a little further north to Hornby Basin, it is a similar kind of situation. In Labrador, the central mineral belt is just emerging as a very important place to be looking for uranium.

Stock Interview: Do you have any favorite companies, which you are following and which have good prospects?

Lawrence Roulston:
NovaGold Resources (TSX: NG; Amex: NG), for example, with the Galore Creek. Its a billion ton deposit with enormous metal content. (Editors Note: Galore Creek has been called one of the largest and highest grade undeveloped porphyry-related gold-silver-copper deposits in North America.)

Stock Interview: What is another of your favorite areas, which has gone largely undetected during this bull market?

Lawrence Roulston:
Nevada would be at the top of the list of anywhere in the world to be working and Alaska right behind it. There is huge potential in Alaska. Mining companies have only scratched the surface of exploration up there. Two of the largest metal deposits in the world are in Alaska. These are both discoveries going back decades, but work over the last couple of years has brought them to the point where theyre now recognized as among the largest metal deposits in the world: Donlin Creek, a 25-plus million ounce gold deposit, and the Pebble deposit, held by Northern Dynasty (TSX: NDM). The Pebble deposit is significantly larger than, and of comparable grade to, Ivanhoes (NYSE: IVN) Oyu Tolgoi (copper-gold) deposit in Mongolia. (Editors Note: The Donlin Creek project is a joint venture between NovaGold and Barrick Gold.)

Stock Interview: Anywhere else in the world where you can find a great, but still new resource investment opportunity, in light of how hard the commodities bull has been stampeding the past few years?

Lawrence Roulston:
Often the better value to be had, or the better opportunity, is in being a little bit out of step with the crowd. One of the areas offering some outstanding opportunities is China.
China has done a tremendous amount of geological work, over the last few decades, but all from the perspective of finding, and then quickly developing, small deposits. There has been very little effort devoted to taking a bigger picture type look at China. The companies that have been able to take a kind of bigger picture look at China have begun to develop what I think are going to be some pretty spectacular results over time.

Stock Interview: Isnt it tough, though, doing business in China?

Lawrence Roulston:
There is still a perception out there that China is a difficult place to do business. Most people from the west walk into China cold and try to do a deal. It would be impossible for them. But, for western companies that are able to team up with groups that are well established within China so that theyre able to find their way through the system over there then there are outstanding opportunities. There are mountains of geological information all in Chinese, of course. Youve got to be able to work within that system and get the information, know how to put the deals together.

Stock Interview: What do you mean by knowing how to put the deals together?

Lawrence Roulston:
If I was to go over to China and try to do a deal to get access to a coalbed methane property, I wouldnt have a clue about how to begin. On the other hand, I could walk into the Petroleum Club in Calgary, and meet a half dozen guys and talk to them. I could build on my leads, and probably in a day be talking about a deal. When you go into China, unless you have somebody on your team that can get into the system and deal with the people, because of language issues, cultural issues and just having access to the information and knowing what sort of terms that they might be looking for Its a different culture from every perspective, and not the least of which is a different way of doing business.

Stock Interview: In your April issue, you recommended one company, which overcame those hurdles, meets your criteria and already has a coalbed methane deal in China.

Lawrence Roulston:
Pacific Asia China Energy (TSX: PCE) established connections in China. They can draw on their contacts and their network. They can get into see the right people, where they can actually talk seriously about doing deals, and have an enormous leg up over somebody that walked in cold and tried to establish and build contacts and put a deal together. I think it is an absolutely outstanding opportunity that theyve seized on.

Stock Interview: There are many coalbed methane opportunities in Alberta. Why look to China?

Lawrence Roulston:
One of the things that makes China interesting is the entry cost to get into a coalbed methane (CBM) play in China is fairly modest. For example, to go to Alberta, or anywhere in the United States, and get access to the exploration rights, or exploitation rights, is enormously expensive. In China, they walked in and, for a fairly modest up-front commitment, obtained a control position in a CBM prospect.

Stock Interview: How does Pacific Asia China Energys coalbed methane property in Guizhou, China rate against other coalbed methane plays?

Lawrence Roulston:
I think its an outstanding opportunity. Chinese government agencies have done an enormous amount of work at delineating the coal. To be able to step into that amount of data as a starting point to build up their CBM resource? The bottom line is that theyre not out there looking for coal. They know exactly where the material is, and theyre able to quickly start defining the issues like recoverability. Theyre drilling in order to establish the basic physical parameters of the flow rates and the content within the coal. I think the companies which are able to effectively exploit the CBM technology in China are going to be the pioneers in that area.

Stock Interview: To Americans, any business in China might appear to be pioneering, since most of still think of China as a third world country.

Lawrence Roulston:
Ive been to China many times and Ive been to parts of China where most people, as tourists, would never get anywhere near, because I go there to look at mineral exploration projects and mining projects. Ive been to every corner of the country as well as the major cities. What I see happening everywhere I go is a pace of development that Ive never seen anywhere else in my life, anywhere in the world. That is, 1.3 billion people are going from a basically rural farm-based economy to a modern industrial economy at a pace that has just never before been conceived.

Stock Interview: How do you quantify that?

Lawrence Roulston:
This is a number that most people wont get, and you wont get until youve been over there and have seen it. There are 300 million people in China that are already well into the middle class. By middle class, I am comparing (the Chinese middle class) to the same absolute standards as we would apply in Canada or the United States in terms of dollars in your bank account, value of your house and your car, and everything else. There are 300 million people that have already achieved that status, which is more than the people at that status in North America. There are another 1 billion people who are busting their butts to get to that level.

Stock Interview: But isnt the rest of the worlds rural population just as industrious and ambitious?

Lawrence Roulston:
Ive been in Africa, the Middle East, Asia and Latin America. If you go into any of those areas and you walk into the small towns, a lot of people are sitting around drinking coffee, crying the blues and complaining about how terrible life is. Go into a similar area in China, and the people are out working in the fields. In the middle of winter, theyre fixing up their fences, the dams and terraces, and clearing rocks, removing trees and stuff like that. Its a high level of industry Ive never seen in any other part of the world. So it goes from that ground level right up to the entrepreneurs, and the guys who are building the high rise condominium complexes in Shanghai.

Stock Interview: How long will it take before American investors realize the impact China has on the global economy?

Lawrence Roulston:
Its going to happen in a gradual way. I think those that keep their heads buried in the sand are going to get left behind as the world pulls ahead. I would suggest any investor in any company ask the question of the company: Is that company involved in some way in China? There are a lot of North American companies that have a very significant presence in China in terms of doing business over there, of getting established, of selling products or manufacturing products in China.

Stock Interview: Why is China so important with regards to this commodities bull market, and are there still opportunities for investors?

Lawrence Roulston:
There is a lot of geological potential, and there is the perception that its difficult. Therefore, there isnt yet a big crowd of people over there chasing after deals. The flip side of it is that China and its neighbors in southeast Asia, representing 3 billion people, are going through the modern industrialization process. That is going to continue to create a massive demand for metals for, I believe, a decade or probably even a couple of decades into the future.

Stock Interview: And most likely, the U.S. investor is going to be left behind or the last one into the pond?

Lawrence Roulston:
The bottom line is that Americans tend to be more inward focused. The other evening I was having dinner with an oil man from Texas who had spent a lot of time in China. He had seen China first hand and was very bullish. I asked him, How many of your countrymen do you think really get it about China? And he responded, Oh, about five. Then he said, Congress doesnt get it, investors dont get it and the man in the street doesnt get it. Americans just dont understand whats happening over there yet.

broker commodity future trading

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • Bumpzee
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google
08 October
0Comments

Explosion in Nuclear Energy Demand Coming


Explosion in Nuclear Energy Demand Coming

Summary: Sprott Asset Management uranium expert Kevin Bambrough talked with us about the second leg of the current uranium bull market. He sees a massive nuclear build up heading our way with the environmentalists leading the charge. He said many price projections may be inaccurate because people are underestimating future demand.

StockInterview: Price forecasts on spot uranium are widening. Some insiders have predicted uranium prices may drop back into the $30/pound range; others, such as yourself, continue to suggest $50/pound or higher. Any comments on the forecasts others are making?

Kevin Bambrough:
There are many people forecasting uranium prices now. Its important to consider their track record of forecasting prices. Look at the contracts that have been written by many companies in the industry, over the last number of years. Anyone who had ceilings, or had signed fixed-priced contracts, has been punished. Very few people in the industry predicted what has happened. Looking forward, I think that in our view, the cost of production of current producers isnt going to be as relevant as it has been in the past. It will be the more marginal, much higher cost producers who will be setting the price.

StockInterview: Isnt there a sense of false optimism that projects in the pipeline will ensure an ongoing stream of uranium oxide for the nuclear fuel cycle?

Kevin Bambrough:
There are a lot of people looking at the supply situation going forward while underestimating future demand. They are very optimistic that mining projects are going to go as planned. We had recent news that Cigar Lake had a problem. There was a flood the. Theres a couple million pounds shortfall to most peoples models for at least two years. All because of one mines six month delay.

StockInterview: Would that have the kind of impact the McArthur flooding (Athabasca Basin, Cameco) had on the spot uranium price a few years ago?

Kevin Bambrough:
I think it could. It was forecast to go up to 18 million pounds of production. That would have been ten percent of the worlds current consumption. Cigar Lake would need to ramp up over a three year period, once it gets started. Now, there is a six month delay. What if its delayed a year? That really changes the production profile for the next decade. There are many projects that could see delays. The mining business is always full of delays. Remember that when we bring on new nuclear plants, they take on average about 1.6 million lbs when commissioning. What will happen, if in a decade, we bring on just 10 or 20 reactors each year? Thats another 16 to 30 million pounds per year of demand just because of the start up.
StockInterview: Does this mean the current uranium bull market still has strong legs?

Kevin Bambrough:
I think were entering the second leg of the bull market here. It is going to move away from a supply shortage story, where we focus on the fact that we only get about 60 percent of the current consumption from mines, while the inventories are being worked off. Now, were moving into a situation where were seeing an explosion in demand growth. Just a couple of years ago when we first started investing in uranium, we could see probably about a dozen nuclear facilities being planned for construction throughout the world. Now weve got well over 100 being planned. It seems there are new additions and talk of more additions every day.

StockInterview: How you envision this nuclear buildup rolling out?

Kevin Bambrough:
I dont think its unreasonable to think, looking ten to twenty years out, there are going to be a lot of countries that will be trying to get in the position that France is in, with a much higher percentage of their power coming from nuclear generation. We could see a move to where maybe 50 percent of global energy production or more could eventually be supplied by nuclear. There is nothing else that can really step up and fill the void and take care of this problem that were having. France produces 78 percent of their electricity from nuclear. Why isnt that reasonable for others? Look out a decade or two, and it doesnt appear like were going to have the oil and the gas in order to handle our needs. Obviously we can do more with coal, but if were going to keep using coal weve got to put in place technology to take care of the carbon dioxide sequestration. If you want to have a stable, secure supply of electricity, it seems that youre going to have to go with more nuclear or eventually with these new coal technologies. I think there is going to have to be a balance of both, because the oil and gas just isnt going to be there.

StockInterview: What do you think is the catalyst for this anticipated growth in nuclear energy demand?

Kevin Bambrough:
The most interesting thing is the fact that some environmentalists are leading the charge to go more nuclear. Its because they realize nuclear energy is the only practical alternative and because of the situation with the carbon dioxide (CO2) levels. There have been some recent reports about CO2 levels reaching 381 parts per billion, just spiking out of the range that has kept the world in a relatively stabile environment for the last 400,000 years. If you look at the work of people like James Hanson, the correlation between CO2 levels and temperature is undeniable. Basically, mankind has increased the CO2 levels beyond a level that hasnt been seen in over a million years. We are just starting to see the weather impacts. There are problems with droughts across the world as well as elevated hurricane activity. Going nuclear on a mass scale is starting to become recognized as one of the only ways to have a real impact. I think what were going to see is an unprecedented build out in nuclear capacity throughout the world in the coming years and decades. Id equate this to what happened when we went from using oil for just lamps and home heating to using it as a transportation fuel. Whats going to happen with the people who have the higher quality uranium reserves and lower cost production? They are going to be able to reap massive profits over the coming decades.

StockInterview: Looking ahead, do you think well see more deals between a small uranium producer, such as Uranium Resources (OTC BB: URRE) and the Japanese multi-national conglomerate, Itochu Corporation?

Kevin Bambrough:
I have no doubt that its going to continue to happen. More importantly, Ive heard that some of the major builders of nuclear facilities around the world, companies such as Areva are quite concerned about the availability of supply going forward. When these companies are talking to countries and utilities that potentially could contract to build nuclear facilities, theyre basically being told that buyers want uranium supply assurances, or they arent going to give an order to buy a nuclear facility. Ive heard they are looking to do joint ventures or at least contract with emerging producers to try to get future supply. Then, they will be able sell their nuclear technology to countries and ensure supply.

StockInterview: Will the Chinese be satisfied with the uranium they plan to buy from Australia, or will they have to tap into uranium production from another or other countries?

Kevin Bambrough:
I think that the Chinese will probably look elsewhere as well. Countries have strategic oil reserves. Why shouldnt they have strategic uranium reserves to supply their nuclear reactors? It makes sense to have a good stockpile of uranium considering the relative cost of nuclear power versus anything else. I dont think that the nuclear power industry should operate on a just in time basis, considering the costs and the risks of making sure you can secure supply. Dont get me wrong. There is plenty of uranium in the world, but were just going to have to pay up for it. I believe were going to consume lot more than what were consuming nowadays a decade or two out. The world is waking up to the reality of peak oil production, and how it is going to affect all aspects of energy production.

StockInterview: How much of a factor will Russia play in the nuclear build up?

Kevin Bambrough:
Looking at some of the recent statements made by Russian officials, its completely clear to me that weve been correct in what weve been thinking for a long time: the HEU agreement (to deliver highly enriched uranium and have it blended down) is probably not going to be renewed. The Russians are planning to make nuclear technology a key export for them, really as a value added product to go with uranium production. They desire to be able to offer a complete solution, not just uranium, but the actual building and technology around the nuclear facilities themselves. They will also have growing uranium demands domestically and have voiced concern about being able to meet their own needs beyond 2015.

StockInterview: But nuclear energy critics claim all of these power plants wont secure financing and most plans are just pipe dreams never to be built.

Kevin Bambrough:
Two years ago, the critics said there would never be any more nuclear plants built in the U.S. People used to say nuclear was over for Germany, and that many countries would exit nuclear power. Now were seeing the exact opposite. Were seeing proposals being done, incentives put in place, and a multitude of projects moving ahead. If what the leading scientists from NASA, the NOAA and from many organizations around the world are saying about global warming, and the acceleration weve recently seen continues, people are going to be begging to have more nuclear facilities and cut CO2 emissions. The environmentalists will be leading the charge.

StockInterview: How long will it take before the proposed nuclear build up impacts the uranium mining companies?

Kevin Bambrough:
The actual build of all this takes time. I think the increase in the positive perception, of the nuclear industry is going to continue to accelerate. All demand for uranium can come from just the planning stage for nuclear power plants, as companies look forward and try to contract future supply. Ultimately, thats what will keep driving the uranium price higher.

StockInterview: How seriously is the nuclear industry taking the global build up?

Kevin Bambrough:
I think the industry is starting to take it very seriously. Thats why the uranium price keeps pushing higher. People are going around trying to contract for uranium, and they are finding it more difficult. People are also starting to realize that as you have problems, such as the McArthur River flooding, which got the uranium bull market jump started, and now a problem at Cigar Lake, you really should have a good build up of inventory in order to protect yourself in this environment. Especially when the relative cost of having to switch off a nuclear facility to go to something else in a pinch is multiples higher.

commodity spread trading

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • Bumpzee
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google